Do Relative Advantages in STEM Grades Explain the Gender Gap in Selection of a STEM Major in College? A Multimethod Answer
Author(s) -
Stearns Elizabeth,
Bottia Martha Cecilia,
Giersch Jason,
Mickelson Roslyn Arlin,
Moller Stephanie,
Jha Nandan,
Dancy Melissa
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
american educational research journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.522
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1935-1011
pISSN - 0002-8312
DOI - 10.3102/0002831219853533
Subject(s) - gender gap , declaration , psychology , mathematics education , political science , demographic economics , law , economics
Using a multimethod approach, we investigate whether gender gaps in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) major declaration in college are explained by differences in the grades that students earn in STEM versus non-STEM subjects. With quantitative data, we find that relative advantages in college academic performance in STEM versus non-STEM subjects do not contribute to the gender gap in STEM major declaration. To explore alternative explanations for gender gaps in major declaration, we analyze interviews with college seniors, finding that they recognize many other factors, including their interests in subject matter and confidence, are key in pushing them from STEM or pulling them into non-STEM majors. We conclude that future research seeking to account for gender gaps in STEM majors must extend beyond academic performance.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom