Evaluation of the New Modular Biogents BG-Pro Mosquito Trap in Comparison to CDC, EVS, BG-Sentinel, and BG-Mosquitaire Traps
Author(s) -
Carolin Marlen Degener,
Kyran M. Staunton,
Hervé Bossin,
Jérôme Marie,
Richard D. Silva,
Daniela Cristina Lima,
Álvaro Eduardo Eiras,
Karen I. Akaratovic,
Jay P. Kiser,
Scott Gordon
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the american mosquito control association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.424
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1943-6270
pISSN - 8756-971X
DOI - 10.2987/21-7003
Subject(s) - trap (plumbing) , biology , mosquito control , modular design , computer science , environmental science , operating system , immunology , environmental engineering , malaria
Mosquito surveillance is an essential component of mosquito control and mosquito traps are a universally employed tool to monitor adult populations. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the new modular Biogents BG-Pro mosquito trap (BGP) and compare its performance to 4 widely used traps for adult mosquitoes: the BG-Sentinel (BGS), the BG Mosquitaire (BGM), the CDC miniature light trap (CDC), and the encephalitis vector survey trap (EVS). One semi-field and 9 field Latin square trials were performed in 7 countries. Results showed that the collection performance of the BGP was equivalent to or exceeded that of the BGS, BGM, CDC, and EVS traps in head-to-head comparisons. The BGP uses 35% less power than the CDC and 75% less than the BGS and BGM. This lower power consumption allows it to run at 5 V for 2 days using a small lightweight 10,000-mAh rechargeable power bank. The BG-Pro is an excellent alternative for the surveillance of mosquito species that are usually monitored with BG-Sentinel, CDC, or EVS traps.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom