z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Toxicity Comparison of Eight Repellents Against Four Species of Female Mosquitoes
Author(s) -
Julia W. Pridgeon,
Ulrich R. Bernier,
James J. Becnel
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of the american mosquito control association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.424
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1943-6270
pISSN - 8756-971X
DOI - 10.2987/08-5837.1
Subject(s) - biology , aedes aegypti , anopheles stephensi , anopheles albimanus , deet , toxicology , aedes , culex quinquefasciatus , culex , mosquito control , veterinary medicine , anopheles , malaria , ecology , larva , immunology , medicine
The relative toxicities of 8 repellents (DMP, Rutgers 612, DEET, IR3535, Picardin, PMD, AI3-35765, and AI3-37220) were evaluated by topical application against females of Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, and An. albimanus. Based on 24-h LD50 values, the most toxic repellent against all 4 mosquito species was AI3-37220, with values of 0.25, 0.20, 0.16, and 0.11 microg/mg for the listed 4 mosquito species, respectively. The least toxic of the 8 repellents tested was DMP, with LD50 values of 5.40, 4.72, 2.50, and 1.83 microg/mg, respectively. Based on the 24-h LD50 values, An. albimanus was the most susceptible species. The findings of the study reported herein provide a comprehensive examination of the toxicities of 4 currently used, 2 formerly used, and 2 experimental repellents against 4 mosquito species.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom