Open AccessCharacteristics of two mountain lion Puma concolor populations in Texas, USA
Author(s) -
Harveson Patricia Moody,
Harveson Louis A.,
HernandezSantin Lorna,
Tewes Michael E.,
Silvy Nova J.,
Pittman Michael T.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
wildlife biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.566
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1903-220X
pISSN - 0909-6396
DOI - 10.2981/10-024
Subject(s) - population , geography , predation , habitat , mark and recapture , hunting season , ecology , seasonal breeder , puma , population density , population size , demography , biology , biochemistry , gene , sociology
Influential factors associated with population dynamics of mountain lions Puma concolor include exploitation rates, prey availability, habitat structure and social structure. Throughout most of North America, mountain lion harvest is regulated by state or provincial quotas or is protected by federal laws. In Texas, however, they are not classified as a game or fur‐bearing animal so their harvest is not regulated. To better understand the differences between population characteristics of mountain lions in west Texas (WTX) and south Texas (STX), we initiated two ecological studies. We captured, radio‐marked and monitored mountain lions to ascertain survival, mortality factors, density, reproduction and population structure. We captured and monitored 19 and 21 mountain lions in the STX and WTX study sites, respectively. Average densities (No/100 km 2 ) were different between our two study sites (STX = 0.269, WTX = 0.427) and were considerably lower than in previous studies. Mortality factors also differed between the two areas; in STX the causes were predominantly hunter harvest compared to trapping in WTX. Seasonal survival rates of mountain lions were lower during the general hunting season (STX = 0.783, WTX = 0.750) than during the non‐hunting season (STX = 0.962, WTX = 0.931). Because population characteristics differed between the two genetically separated populations (Walker et al. 2000), resource managers should consider evaluating regional, rather than statewide management plans for mountain lions in Texas.