z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Perch Site Selection by Reintroduced Peregrine Falcons Falco Peregrinus
Author(s) -
Dzialak Matthew R.,
Carter Kristina M.,
Lacki Michael J.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
wildlife biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.566
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1903-220X
pISSN - 0909-6396
DOI - 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[225:pssbrp]2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - peregrinus , perch , deciduous , biology , canopy , selection (genetic algorithm) , zoology , forestry , ecology , geography , fishery , fish <actinopterygii> , artificial intelligence , computer science
As part of a program to recover the peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus in the southeastern U.S. we recorded perching behaviour with the objective of characterizing perches used in the reintroduction area. We used a site‐attribute design and logistic regression to compare characteristics between used and non‐used perches. Peregrines used pines Pinus spp. exclusively, while pines comprised 78% of available trees. Perches were larger than non‐used trees (diameter at breast height in cm (in x¯ ± SD); 29.2 ± 15.7 and 23.9 ± 10.3), in more advanced stages of decay (2.5 ± 1.5 and 1.5 ± 1.1 (index)), and usually dominant in crown class (1.5 ± 0.6 and 1.7 ± 0.5 (index)). Perches were always on cliff plateaus and tended to be situated in sites with a less even canopy (0.5 ± 0.3 and 0.7 ± 0.2 (index)) and fewer deciduous stems (1.8 ± 3.4 and 2.3 ± 2.3 (stem density)) than non‐used trees. These attributes depict selection of perches that provide unobstructed flight paths, good visibility, and a capacity to detect and respond rapidly to stimuli.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here