z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Age, Sex and Relocation Distance as Predictors of Return for Relocated Nuisance Black Bears Ursus americanus in Ontario, Canada
Author(s) -
Landriault Lynn J.,
Brown Glen S.,
Hamr Josef,
Mallory Frank F.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
wildlife biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.566
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1903-220X
pISSN - 0909-6396
DOI - 10.2981/07-084
Subject(s) - ursus , relocation , nuisance , juvenile , demography , population , logistic regression , geography , ecology , biology , statistics , mathematics , sociology , computer science , programming language
Relocation has been used as a management tool for nuisance black bears Ursus americanus for decades. Using tag recovery data from relocated nuisance bears in Ontario, Canada, we developed predictive models to assist managers in determining the efficacy of black bear relocation based on the sex and age of the animal, and a range of relocation distances. We considered relocation success in terms of nuisance recurrence rates and whether bears returned to within 20 km of the capture site. A minimum of 30% of relocated bears were subsequently involved in another nuisance event and adult females were the segment of the population most likely to re‐offend (48%). Adult bears consistently exhibited higher return rates than juveniles (73 vs 29%), hence we modeled these two groups separately. Based on logistic regression models, the probability of return for animals 1–3 years of age increased with age, females were more likely to return than males, and return rates decreased with increasing relocation distance. For bears ≥4 years of age, these variables were poor predictors of return; the model had difficulty identifying bears that did not return. We used receiver‐operating characteristic curves to estimate relocation distance thresholds for juvenile bears. The results suggest that 2‐ and 3‐year‐old male bears will not return to within 20 km of the capture area if relocated a minimum of 30 km and 64 km, respectively. Although relocation appears to be an effective strategy for the management of juvenile male bears, success rates were low for adults. Our findings can aid resource managers in making more informed decisions as to the potential effectiveness of relocation as a management tool.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here