z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
THE EFFECT OF PEER REVIEW ON EFL STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL IN WRITING “NURSING CARE DOCUMENTATION
Author(s) -
Arina Hafadhotul Husna
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
english education journal of english teaching and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2580-3441
pISSN - 2503-4405
DOI - 10.29407/jetar.v2i2.854
Subject(s) - documentation , test (biology) , nursing , psychology , control (management) , statistic , medical education , peer feedback , constructive , quality (philosophy) , mathematics education , medicine , computer science , process (computing) , mathematics , paleontology , philosophy , statistics , epistemology , artificial intelligence , biology , programming language , operating system
This study concerns on the effect of peer review on EFL students’ writing skill in writing nursing care documentation. The aims of this study are to investigate the possible effectiveness of the peer review technique to increase the quality of nursing students’ writing skill and to see whether this method motivates student to write. The method of the study is quantitative method. The participants were 78 nursing students in the fourth semester of Cendekia Utama Health College. They were randomly categorized into two experimental and control groups. In the experimental group were providing with an additional peer review instruction propossed by O’Muirheartaigh (1990). It includes the provision of constructive feedback to their peers and evaluating and correcting the peer’s performances. They were paired for peer review, conferencing and exchanging their Nursing care documentation with those of their peers. The reviewers had to correct, evaluate and respond those Nursing care documentation. While, in the control group were traditionally handled by teacher who assigned them homework and correct their Nursing care documentation by themselves. The experiment was run over two months. The data were collected using questionnaire, pre – test and post – test for language proficiency and writing skill, peer response sheet, writing criteria and guidelines sheet. The result of the study indicated that p-score is 0,000 <0,05, so that Ho is Rejected and Ha is Accepted. It means there is difference of Pre Test with Post Test score. It is known that statistic t arithmetic is -6.202 which means the score of pre test is smaller than post test with point score 6.202. It indicated that the writing of the students in the experimental group improved more than those in control group. Also, those engaged in peer review method were motivated to write more and enjoy writing. It was concluded that peer review provides learners with an authentic audience, increase the students’ motivation for writing and enables them to receive different views on their writing.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom