z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage at the Interface of Titanium and Zirconium Abutments Following Oblique Cyclic Loading: An in vitro Study
Author(s) -
Shahbaz Naser Mostofi,
Arash Zarbakhsh,
Mohammad Mehdi Alaei
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of research in dental sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2228-7353
pISSN - 2008-4676
DOI - 10.29252/jrds.16.3.162
Subject(s) - materials science , titanium , zirconium , oblique case , dentistry , composite material , metallurgy , medicine , linguistics , philosophy
Background and Aim : Microgap in the implant-abutment interface is one of the main challenges in the treatment of two-piece implants. This study aimed to investigate the effect of two types of abutments (zirconia and titanium) on microgap at implant-abutment interface area under oblique cyclic loading in vitro. Methods and Materials In this in vitro study, 12 implant-abutment assemblies were used, each containing six sets with either zirconia or titanium abutments and vertically mounted in the modified resin blocks of auto-polymerized polyester base. The specimens were then subjected to oblique cyclic loading of 75 N at a 30 ± 2 degrees angle to the longitudinal axis of the implant with a frequency of 1 Hz in 500,000 cycles, equivalent to 20 months of human mastication. For the microgap analysis, direct observation from the top was used with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a magnification of 5000×. Statistical analysis was used to compare the microgap before and after the application of loading with the paired t-test. Results: The amount of microgap before force application in the titanium abutment group was (2.6±0.7) significantly higher than the zirconia abutments (1.9±0.5) (P = 0.033). The dimension of the microgap in the titanium abutment group significantly decreased following cyclic loading (P = 0.047), but in the zirconia group showed a significant increase (P = 0.035). Finally, the dimension of the microgap following oblique cyclic loading in the titanium abutment group (2.0±0.8) was not significantly different with the zirconia abutments (2.7±0.9) (P = 0.262). Conclusion: The difference of microgap after oblique cyclic loading between two types of titanium abutment and zirconium abutment is not significant, and both are clinically acceptable.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom