z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Statement on safety of cannabidiol as a novel food: data gaps and uncertainties
Author(s) -
Turck Dominique,
Bohn Torsten,
Castenmiller Jacqueline,
De Henauw Stefaan,
HirschErnst Karen Ildico,
Maciuk Alexandre,
Mangelsdorf Inge,
McArdle Harry J,
Naska Androniki,
Pelaez Carmen,
Pentieva Kristina,
Siani Alfonso,
Thies Frank,
Tsabouri Sophia,
Vinceti Marco,
Cubadda Francesco,
Frenzel Thomas,
Hein Marina,
Marchelli Rosangela,
NeuhäuserBerthold Monika,
Poulsen Morten,
Prieto Maradona Miguel,
Schlatter Josef Rudolf,
Trezza Viviana,
van Loveren Henk,
Albert Océane,
Dumas Céline,
Germini Andrea,
Gelbmann Wolfgang,
Kass Georges,
Kouloura Eirini,
Noriega Fernandez Estefania,
Rossi Annamaria,
Knutsen Helle Katrine
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7322
Subject(s) - cannabidiol , context (archaeology) , adverse effect , medicine , food safety , pharmacology , drug , environmental health , cannabis , biology , psychiatry , pathology , paleontology
The European Commission has determined that cannabidiol (CBD) can be considered as a novel food (NF), and currently, 19 applications are under assessment at EFSA. While assessing these, it has become clear that there are knowledge gaps that need to be addressed before a conclusion on the safety of CBD can be reached. Consequently, EFSA has issued this statement, summarising the state of knowledge on the safety of CBD consumption and highlighting areas where more data are needed. Literature searches for both animal and human studies have been conducted to identify safety concerns. Many human studies have been carried out with Epidyolex ® , a CBD drug authorised to treat refractory epilepsies. In the context of medical conditions, adverse effects are tolerated if the benefit outweighs the adverse effect. This is, however, not acceptable when considering CBD as a NF. Furthermore, most of the human data referred to in the CBD applications investigated the efficacy of Epidyolex (or CBD) at therapeutic doses. No NOAEL could be identified from these studies. Given the complexity and importance of CBD receptors and pathways, interactions need to be taken into account when considering CBD as a NF. The effects on drug metabolism need to be clarified. Toxicokinetics in different matrices, the half‐life and accumulation need to be examined. The effect of CBD on liver, gastrointestinal tract, endocrine system, nervous system and on psychological function needs to be clarified. Studies in animals show significant reproductive toxicity, and the extent to which this occurs in humans generally and in women of child‐bearing age specifically needs to be assessed. Considering the significant uncertainties and data gaps, the Panel concludes that the safety of CBD as a NF cannot currently be established.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here