Predication: The Test For Tax Avoidance in New Zealand From Newton to Ben Nevis
Author(s) -
John Prebble,
Hamish McIntosh
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
victoria university of wellington law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1179-3082
pISSN - 1171-042X
DOI - 10.26686/vuwlr.v46i3.4893
Subject(s) - test (biology) , supreme court , tax avoidance , law , parliament , balancing test , political science , revenue , economics , tax reform , politics , paleontology , accounting , biology
General anti-avoidance rules in income tax legislation are a blunt instrument. They can operate most effectively when decision makers move directly from the rule, such as "Arrangements with the purpose of tax avoidance are void against the Commissioner" to the facts, for example, "Objectively, do these facts demonstrate a purpose of avoidance?", or to paraphrase Lord Denning's test, "Viewing these facts objectively, can one predicate an avoidance purpose?"
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom