International Criminal Law and New Zealand Refugee Status Determinations: A Case Note on Attorney-General v Tamil X
Author(s) -
Ella Watt
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
victoria university of wellington law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1179-3082
pISSN - 1171-042X
DOI - 10.26686/vuwlr.v43i2.5033
Subject(s) - refugee , tamil , law , supreme court , jurisprudence , political science , convention , refugee law , sociology , philosophy , linguistics
This article considers Attorney-General v Tamil X, a recent New Zealand Supreme Court decision on refugee status determinations. Specifically, it considers the approach taken to art 1F of the Refugee Convention in decisions on the exclusion of claimants from refugee status. As claims are increasingly affected by art 1F considerations, it is imperative that the law in this complicated area is clear and just. This article traces Tamil X's advancement through the courts, and presents an analysis of the Supreme Court's judgment. The article also recommends some future developments for the jurisprudence on the exclusion clauses, specifically the adoption of a modified version of the ICTY jurisprudence on joint criminal enterprise.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom