Comment on Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal | Zendy

Luke Nottage | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comment on Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal

Author(s) -

Luke Nottage

Publication year - 2001

Publication title -

victoria university of wellington law review

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 1179-3082

pISSN - 1171-042X

DOI - 10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5875

Subject(s) - common law , divergence (linguistics) , statutory law , law , civil law (civil law) , context (archaeology) , convergence (economics) , political science , private law , comparative law , public law , dimension (graph theory) , law and economics , sociology , economics , geography , mathematics , philosophy , linguistics , archaeology , economic growth , pure mathematics

This comment attempts to place in broader context the article in this issue by Caslav Pejovic, "Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal". The latter draws on several decades of his academic research and practical experience in navigating among differing legal systems, particularly in maritime law. This area of law requires an appreciation of both substantive and procedural law, how general principles come to be applied in evolving transactional contexts, and pressures towards – and sometimes against – the unification and harmonisation of normative frameworks.1

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research