Pelas mãos do socioeducativo : práticas disciplinares na medida socioeducativa de internação

This dissertation aimed to analyze the duplicity of criminal control over young offenders in fulfillment of socio-educational measure of internment in the Brazilian Federal District during the year 2014 from the examination of the socio-educational practices and the performance of the justice systems. In this research, young offenders are those who are admitted to the practice of an infraction and have between 18 and 20 years old. Of this universe, the cases of young offenders who had involvement in disciplinary incidents during the year 2014 were analyzed. The universe was based on the total of young offenders who were in fulfillment of socio-educative action on January 2, 2015. The fieldwork was conducted in youth detention center of Recanto das Emas (Unire) Systematic output (Uniss) and Brazlândia (Uibra) located in the Federal District with documentary research application and qualitative observation, besides the use of visa memory as a professional. The main source of research was the files of detained youths and records the institutional routine. Data analysis used mixed methods involving coding and development of own categories of qualitative research. Checks whether, in the socioeducative practices, a logic that aims at education for punishment and discipline. In particular, in relation to detained youths, the criminal responsibility within a youth detention center can become a limbo for the prison system. Those who commit disciplinary occurrences beyond internal procedures punishment has the prison system operated by means of socio-educative practices. This study also aimed to discuss the perversity of the procedure to refer to the police station to police record and other socioeducative practices, rather than re-socialize as recommended discipline, punish and normalize. Disciplinary incidents that occurred in 2014, 32% ended in police stations for police record. In most cases, if dealt with property damage, fights between young or possession of some kind of narcotic substance. This percentage, 26 (20%) young people were disconnected from the socio-educative system as a result of the seizure in the prison system in 2014 after the commission of a disciplinary occurrence within an youth detention center. In most instances, for having damaged sinks, showers, toilets and mattresses. Thus, notes that the systems socio-educative and prison work in a relationship of continuity. The state, in the figure of the justice system, exerts its power to punish continuously and even simultaneously through the socio-educative system and the criminal justice system on youth in fulfilling of socio-educative action. In this sense, the purpose of socio-educative action as mechanisms of social reintegration as opposed to the prison system is not being fulfilled. The own socio-educational measure of internment cannot avoid new admissions, including prison. Key-words: Criminal control. Young offenders. Social and educational practices. Socioeducational measure of internment. Punishment.