Where Would the Federal Funds Rate Be, If It Could Be Negative?
Author(s) -
Ellis W. Talman,
Saeed Zaman
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
economic commentary (federal reserve bank of cleveland)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2163-3738
pISSN - 0428-1276
DOI - 10.26509/frbc-ec-201215
Subject(s) - federal funds , zero lower bound , excess reserves , economics , monetary economics , monetary policy , recession , zero (linguistics) , great recession , interest rate , path (computing) , quantitative easing , macroeconomics , keynesian economics , central bank , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , programming language
In the wake of Great Recession, the Federal Reserve engaged in conventional monetary policy actions by reducing the federal funds rate. But soon the rate hit zero, and could go no lower. In such environments, policymakers still think in terms of where the federal funds rate should be, were it possible to go negative. To project the “unconstrained path” of the funds rate—ignoring the zero lower bound—and to identify the key underlying shocks driving that path, we employ a statistical macroeconomic forecasting model. We find that the federal funds rate would have been extremely negative during 2009-2010.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom