z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
RAPIDLY ADAPTIVE CFAR DETECTION IN ANTENNA ARRAYS
Author(s) -
Anatolii A. Koov
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
progress in electromagnetics research m
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.216
H-Index - 31
ISSN - 1937-8726
DOI - 10.2528/pierm18092401
Subject(s) - antenna (radio) , computer science , constant false alarm rate , telecommunications , artificial intelligence
This paper addresses the problem of target detection in adaptive arrays in situations where only a small number of training samples is available. Within the framework of two-stage adaptive detection paradigm, the paper proposes a class of rapidly adaptive CFAR (Constant False Alarm Rate) detection algorithms, which are referred to as joint loaded persymmetric-Toeplitz adaptive matched filter (JLPT-AMF) detectors. A JLPT-AMF detector combines, using a joint detection rule, individual scalar CFAR decisions from two rapidly adaptive two-stage (TS) detectors: a TS TAMF detector and a TS LPAMF detector. The former is based on a TMI filter, which is an adaptive array filter employing a Toeplitz covariance matrix (CM) estimate inversion. The latter is based on an adaptive LPMI filter that uses diagonally loaded persymmetric CM estimate inversion. The proposed class of adaptive detectors may incorporate any rapidly adaptive TS TAMF and TS LPAMF detectors, which, in turn, may employ any scalar CFAR detection algorithms that satisfy an earlier derived linearity condition. The two-stage adaptive processing structure of the JLPT-AMF detectors ensures the CFAR property independently of the antenna array dimension M , the interference CM, and the number of training samples NCME to be used for estimating this CM. Moreover, the rapidly adaptive JLPT-AMF detectors exhibit highly reliable detection performances, which are robust to the angular separation between the sources, even when NCME is about m/2 ∼ m, m is the number of interference sources. The robustness is analytically proven and verified with statistical simulations. For several representative scenarios when the interference CM has m dominant eigenvalues, comparative performance analysis for the proposed rapidly adaptive detectors is provided using Monte-Carlo simulations. Abbreviations and Acronyms ACE Adaptive Coherence Estimator LPMI Loaded Persymmetric Matrix (Estimate) Inversion AMF Adaptive Matched Filter LR Low Rank BAD Basic Adaptive Detector LSMI Loaded Sample Matrix Inversion BD Benchmark Detector ROC Receiver Operating Characteristic CFAR Constant False Alarm Rate SCM Sample Covariance Matrix CM Covariance Matrix SNR Signal-to-Noise Ratio DOA Direction of Arrival SRL Statistical Resolution Limit GLRT Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test TAMF Toeplitz (Matrix Estimate Inversion) AMF INR Interference-to-Noise Ratio TCME Toeplitz Covariance Matrix Estimation JLPT-AMF Joint Loaded Persymmetric-Toeplitz TMI Toeplitz Matrix (Estimate) Inversion (Matrix Estimates Inversion) AMF LAMF Loaded (Sample Matrix Inversion) AMF TS Two-Stage LPAMF Loaded Persymmetric (Matrix Estimate ULA Uniform Linear Array

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom