A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders of Low Back
Author(s) -
Eko Susetyo Kuspradiyanto,
Putu Bida,
M. Mansyur,
F. Effendi,
R. Herespatiagni
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
all days
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.2523/iptc-12762-abstract
Subject(s) - psychosocial , low back pain , psychogenic disease , sitting , musculoskeletal disorder , medicine , epidemiology , physical therapy , back pain , risk factor , environmental health , human factors and ergonomics , alternative medicine , psychiatry , poison control , pathology
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Musculoskeletal disorders in particular low back pain, is one of the most common occupational health problems in Total E&P Indonesie. Multiple factors including mechanical and psychosocial are among possible determinants of interest. In order to prevent MSD, the risk factors in the workplace that contribute to the development of low back pain had been studied. Resulted 5 categories; working environment, psychosocial, bio - mechanic, occupational and socio-demographic. This research had been conducted in eight months (June 2007- February 2008) with the permanent employee as the subject. Research conducted into two group, MSD surveillance from mechanical aspects and from psychological aspect. Epidemiological analysis consists of three stages:Conclusion of risk factors and determinantsQuantity of risk factorEpidemiogic analysis. The objective of the critical review is to deeply explore the risk factors, and sharing idea to manage them. MSD surveillance, prevalence studies, mechanical and psychogenic back pain, and other risk factors and predictors model, had been studied in order for problem mitigation. RESEARCH RESULT LBP Risk to Gender: man has better protection than woman. (OR 0,276) Working on site, has higher risk to LBP than office. (OR 7.586) Comfort working place and spatial provide better protection to LBP. (OR 0,466) Bending over midline body have significants relation to LBP's prevalens (OR 1,586) Lifting over shoulder have significant relation to LBP's prevalence (OR 1.571) Sitting position group, has higher risk to LBP. (OR 3.184) Comparing LBP prevalence found in this rsearch with data aboved, LBP prevalence in TI are far below. This lower prevalence it may come from existing 'recovery time' betwen tasks among Total Indonesie workers. CONCLUSIONS The researches found that there are some existing working condition, posture, gesture, and psychological aspects as risk factor of LBP. LBP prevalence in Total E&P Indonesie is lower (4.7%) compare to LBP prevalence in petroleum industry (22%) may come from existing 'recovery time' betwen tasks among Total Indonesie workers. RECOMMENDATIONS Socialization and training of proper work practices is required. 2 IPTC 12762 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Great thanks to IPTC Committee as well to the opportunity to present this research. Honour respect and thanks also to Total Indonesie Management, HSE Manager and Head of Medical Department, which has allowed this research conducted. Thanks also to all research team member for the good relationship and coordination, last but not least, thanks to DR. M. Mansyur for guiding team in performing this research.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom