z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prognostic Models in Adults Undergoing Physical Therapy for Rotator Cuff Disorders: Systematic Review
Author(s) -
Cordula Braun,
Nigel Hanchard,
Alan M. Batterham,
Helen HG Handoll,
Andreas Betthäuser
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
physical therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1538-6724
pISSN - 0031-9023
DOI - 10.2522/ptj.20150475
Subject(s) - medicine , rotator cuff , cinahl , context (archaeology) , physical therapy , medline , meta analysis , clinical trial , systematic review , subgroup analysis , cochrane library , adverse effect , physical medicine and rehabilitation , intensive care medicine , surgery , psychological intervention , psychiatry , paleontology , political science , law , biology
Background Rotator cuff–related disorders represent the largest subgroup of shoulder complaints. Despite the availability of various conservative and surgical treatment options, the precise indications for these options remain unclear. Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the available research on prognostic models for predicting outcomes in adults undergoing physical therapy for painful rotator cuff disorders. Data Sources The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PEDro databases and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) up to October 2015 were searched. Study Selection The review included primary studies exploring prognostic models in adults undergoing physical therapy, with or without other conservative measures, for painful rotator cuff disorders. Primary outcomes were pain, disability, and adverse events. Inclusion was limited to prospective investigations of prognostic factors elicited at the baseline assessment. Study selection was independently performed by 2 reviewers. Data Extraction A pilot-tested form was used to extract data on key aspects of study design, characteristics, analyses, and results. Risk of bias and applicability were independently assessed by 2 reviewers using the Prediction Study Risk of Bias Assessment tool (PROBAST). Data Synthesis Five studies were included in the review. These studies were extremely heterogeneous in many aspects of design, conduct, and analysis. The findings were analyzed narratively. Limitations All included studies were rated as at high risk of bias, and none of the resulting prognostic models was found to be usable in clinical practice. Conclusions There are no prognostic models ready to inform clinical practice in the context of the review question, highlighting the need for further research on prognostic models for predicting outcomes in adults who undergo physical therapy for painful rotator cuff disorders. The design and conduct of future studies should be receptive to developing methods.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom