z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Interpreting Effectiveness Evidence in Pain: Short Tour of Contemporary Issues
Author(s) -
Neil E O’Connell,
G. Lorimer Moseley,
James H. McAuley,
Benedict M. Wand,
Rob Herbert
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
physical therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1538-6724
pISSN - 0031-9023
DOI - 10.2522/ptj.20140480
Subject(s) - systematic review , economic shortage , clinical trial , evidence based medicine , evidence based practice , quality (philosophy) , medicine , alternative medicine , medline , psychology , best evidence , intensive care medicine , political science , linguistics , government (linguistics) , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , law
There is no shortage of treatment approaches offered to people with pain. The maze of options presents patients and clinicians with difficult choices. Key to making those choices is evidence of treatment effectiveness provided by clinical trials and systematic reviews. Recent growth in the number of clinical trials and systematic reviews, of both high and low quality, makes it vital that users of this evidence-clinicians, researchers, patients, and policy makers-have the skills and knowledge to critically interpret these studies. In this review, we discuss some contemporary issues regarding evidence of effectiveness derived from clinical trials and systematic reviews-issues that we think are critical to understanding the field. We focus on evidence of treatment effectiveness in pain, although many of these issues are relevant to and transferable across the spectrum of evidence-based practice.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom