Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training Before Cardiac Surgery in Routine Care
Author(s) -
Karin Valkenet,
Frederiek de Heer,
Frank Backx,
Jaap C.A. Trappenburg,
Erik H.J. Hulzebos,
S. Kwant,
Lex A. van Herwerden,
Ingrid van de Port
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
physical therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1538-6724
pISSN - 0031-9023
DOI - 10.2522/ptj.20110475
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , intensive care unit , cardiac surgery , odds ratio , propensity score matching , randomized controlled trial , pneumonia , mechanical ventilation , complication , surgery , physical therapy
Background Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) before cardiac surgery has proved to be a promising intervention to reduce postoperative pneumonia in a randomized controlled trial setting. Effects of IMT in routine care have not been reported. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of IMT before cardiac surgery on postoperative pneumonia in routine care at a Dutch university medical center using propensity scoring. Design This was an observational cohort study. Methods All candidates for cardiac surgery were preoperatively stratified by a physical therapist for low risk or high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients at high risk either engaged in an unsupervised IMT program (20 minutes a day) at home for at least 2 weeks before surgery (group 1) or received usual care (no IMT) (group 2). Results in terms of outcome measures were adjusted with propensity scores to reduce bias caused by nonrandom treatment assignment. Results The results showed that of the 94 patients at high risk in group 1, 1 patient (1.1%) developed a postoperative pneumonia. In group 2, 8 out of the 252 patients at high risk (3.2%) developed this pulmonary complication (adjusted odds ratio=0.34, 95% confidence interval=0.04–3.38). No significant differences were found regarding median (25th–75th percentile) ventilation time (7 [5–9] hours versus 7 [5–10] hours), length of stay in the intensive care unit (23 [21–24] hours versus 23 [21–25] hours), or total postoperative length of stay (7 [6–11] days versus 7 [5–9] days). Limitations The most important limitations of this study were confounding, incomplete data collection, and a low incidence of the primary outcome. Conclusions Propensity scoring is believed to be a valuable tool of great potential interest to researchers in the field of observational studies. Whether IMT in routine care resulted in less postoperative pneumonia cannot be concluded.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom