z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of Maximum Tolerated Muscle Torques Produced by 2 Pulse Durations
Author(s) -
Wayne Scott,
James B. Causey,
Tara L. Marshall
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
physical therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1538-6724
pISSN - 0031-9023
DOI - 10.2522/ptj.20080151
Subject(s) - pulse (music) , stimulation , isometric exercise , pulse duration , microsecond , duration (music) , torque , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , physics , acoustics , laser , astronomy , detector , optics , thermodynamics
Background Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an effective therapeutic technique for strengthening weak muscles. A positive dose-response relationship exists between the elicited muscle forces during training and strength (force-generating capacity) gains. Patient discomfort limits NMES muscle forces, potentially compromising efficacy. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the NMES muscle torques produced by stimulation trains consisting of 2 different pulse durations. Design During a single testing session, the 2 pulse duration conditions (50 and 200 microseconds) were tested on the opposite lower extremities of the participants. Methods The study participants were 10 adults without remarkable medical histories. The maximum tolerated isometric knee extensor torque was the primary dependent variable. The peak currents and phase charges that produced the maximally tolerated torques, as well as the sensory, motor, and pain thresholds for the 2 pulse conditions, were compared. Results The 200-microsecond pulse duration condition resulted in participants tolerating significantly greater muscle torques; it was associated with significantly greater phase charges but significantly lower peak currents. Limitations This study only compared muscle torques in response to stimulation trains consisting of pulses with short (50-microsecond) or medium (200-microsecond) durations and did not examine long (∼400- to 600-microsecond) durations. Furthermore, the result of this study may not apply to NMES that uses stimulation patterns other than monophasic, square-wave pulsed current. Conclusions It has been suggested that short pulse durations are most appropriate for NMES because they are less likely to recruit nociceptors. The results of this study, however, support the use of a medium pulse duration rather than a short pulse duration when the goal is to produce a maximum torque response from a muscle. These observations may be related to the currents and phase charges for the pain thresholds for the 2 pulse duration conditions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom