Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review | Zendy

Susan Armijo Olivo | Zendy; Luciana Macedo | Zendy; Inaê Caroline Gadotti | Zendy; Jorge Fuentes | Zendy; Tasha R. Stanton | Zendy; David J. Magee | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review

Author(s) -

Susan Armijo Olivo,

Luciana Macedo,

Inaê Caroline Gadotti,

Jorge Fuentes,

Tasha R. Stanton,

David J. Magee

Publication year - 2007

Publication title -

physical therapy

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998

H-Index - 150

eISSN - 1538-6724

pISSN - 0031-9023

DOI - 10.2522/ptj.20070147

Subject(s) - jadad scale , randomized controlled trial , reliability (semiconductor) , systematic review , scale (ratio) , external validity , validity , internal validity , quality (philosophy) , criterion validity , medline , psychology , physical therapy , medicine , clinical psychology , psychometrics , construct validity , social psychology , pathology , power (physics) , philosophy , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , political science , law , cochrane library

The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is commonly evaluated in order to assess the risk of biased estimates of treatment effects. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify scales used to evaluate the methodological quality of RCTs in health care research and summarize the content, construction, development, and psychometric properties of these scales.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research