Validity of Clinical Measurement Instruments Assessing Scapular Function: Insufficient Evidence to Recommend Any Instrument for Assessing Scapular Posture, Movement, and Dysfunction—A Systematic Review | Zendy

Norman E. D'hondt | Zendy; Jan Pool | Zendy; Henri Kiers | Zendy; Caroline B. Terwee | Zendy; H.E.J. Veeger | Zendy

Open Access

Validity of Clinical Measurement Instruments Assessing Scapular Function: Insufficient Evidence to Recommend Any Instrument for Assessing Scapular Posture, Movement, and Dysfunction—A Systematic Review

Author(s) -

Norman E. D'hondt,

Jan Pool,

Henri Kiers,

Caroline B. Terwee,

H.E.J. Veeger

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.367

H-Index - 121

eISSN - 1938-1344

pISSN - 0190-6011

DOI - 10.2519/jospt.2020.9265

Subject(s) - criterion validity , checklist , physical medicine and rehabilitation , functional movement , medicine , range of motion , construct validity , cinahl , medline , physical therapy , psychology , psychometrics , clinical psychology , cognitive psychology , psychiatry , political science , psychological intervention , law

To determine the construct validity, criterion validity, and responsiveness of measurement instruments evaluating scapular function.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research