z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A gloss to the Supreme Administrative Court judgement of 17 July 2018 (II GSK 844/18) – approving
Author(s) -
Marta Woźniak
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the opole studies in administration and law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2658-1922
pISSN - 1731-8297
DOI - 10.25167/osap.2183
Subject(s) - judgement , supreme court , gloss (optics) , law , sentence , majority opinion , political science , concurring opinion , medicine , computer science , certiorari , original jurisdiction , artificial intelligence , chemistry , organic chemistry , coating
The sentence which the gloss refers to presents the breakthrough stance of the Supreme Administrative Court, where it is acknowledged that the decision issued by the Minister of Health, concerning the refusal to refund a medicament containing medical marijuana, infringes on the patient’s rights in the sphere of selection of an effective method of treatment in the situation where conventional methods have proved inefficient. In the opinion of the Court, eventual doubts – with reference to both the interpretation of the regulations dealing with healthcare and evaluation of the factual state of the case in question – should be settled in favor of protection of life and human health. Treatment with preparations including medical marijuana writes into the current of in dubio pro vita humana.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom