z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Design of the Cruise and Flap Airfoil for the X-57 Maxwell Distributed Electric Propulsion Aircraft
Author(s) -
Jeffrey K. Viken,
Sally Viken,
Karen Deere,
Melissa Carter
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
35th aiaa applied aerodynamics conference
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.2514/6.2017-3922
Subject(s) - airfoil , naca airfoil , aerospace engineering , stall (fluid mechanics) , chord (peer to peer) , angle of attack , lift coefficient , aerodynamic center , lift to drag ratio , zero lift drag coefficient , drag , physics , marine engineering , aerodynamics , lift induced drag , mechanics , pitching moment , engineering , turbulence , computer science , reynolds number , distributed computing
A computational and design study on an airfoil and high-lift flap for the X-57 Maxwell Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) testbed aircraft was conducted. The aircraft wing sizing study resulted in a wing area of 66.67 ft2 and aspect ratio of 15 with a design requirement of Vstall = 58 KEAS, at a gross weight of 3,000 lb. To meet this goal an aircraft CL,max of 4.0 was required. The design cruise condition is 150 KTAS at 8,000 ft. This resulted in airfoil requirements of cl ~ 0.90 for the cruise condition at Re = 2.35 x 106. A flapped airfoil with a cl,max of approximately 2.5 or greater, at Re = 1.0 x 106, was needed to have enough lift to meet the stall requirement with the DEP system. MSES computational analyses were conducted on the GAW-1, GAW-2, and the NACA 5415 airfoil sections, however they had limitations in either high drag or low cl,max on the cruise airfoil, which was the impetus for a new design. A design was conducted to develop a low drag airfoil for the X-57 cruise conditions with high cl,max. The final design was the GNEW5BP93B airfoil with a minimum drag coefficient of cd = 0.0053 at cl = 0.90 and achieved laminar flow back to 69% chord on the upper surface and 62% chord on the lower surface. With fully turbulent flow, the drag increases to cd = 0.0120. The predicted maximum lift with turbulent flow is a cl,max of 1.95 at = 19°. The airfoil is characterized by relatively flat pressure gradient regions on both surfaces at = 0°, and aft camber to get extra lift out of the lower surface concave region. A 25% chord slotted flap was designed and analyzed with MSES for a 30° flap deflection. Additional 30° and 40° flap deflection analyses for two flap positions were conducted with USM3D using several turbulence models, for two angles of attack, to assess near cl,max with varied flap position. The maximum cl varied between 2.41 and 3.35. An infinite-span powered high-lift study was conducted on a GAW-1 constant chord 40° flapped airfoil section with FUN3D to quantify the airfoil lift increment that can be expected from a DEP system. The 16.7 hp/propeller blown wing increases the maximum CL from 3.45 to CL = 6.43, which is an effective q ratio of 1.86. This indicates that if the unblown high-lift flapped airfoil of the X-57 airplane achieves a cl,max of 2.78, then the high-lift augmentation blowing could yield a sectional lift coefficient of approximately 4.95 at cl,max. Finally, a computational study was conducted with FUN3D on an infinite-span constant chord GAW-1 cruise airfoil to determine the impact of high-lift propeller diameter to wing chord ratio on the lift increment of the DEP system. A constant diameter propeller and nacelle size were used in the study. Three computational grids were made with airfoil chords of 0.5*chord, 1.0*chord, and 2.0*chord. Results of the propeller diameter to wing chord ratio study indicated that the blown to unblown CL ratio increased as the chord was decreased. However, because of the increase in relative size of the high-lift nacelle to the wing, which impacted wing lift performance, the study indicated that a propeller diameter to wing chord ratio of 1.0 gives the overall best maximum lift on the wing with the DEP system.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom