z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
2D high-lift airfoil noise measurements in an aerodynamic wind tunnel
Author(s) -
Christopher J. Bahr,
William M. Humphreys,
Daniel Ernst,
Thomas Ahlefeldt,
Carsten Spehr,
Antonio Pereira,
Quentin Leclère,
Christophe Picard,
Ric Porteous,
Danielle Moreau,
Jeoffrey Fischer,
Con J. Doolan
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
hal (le centre pour la communication scientifique directe)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.2514/6.2015-2206
Subject(s) - airfoil , wind tunnel , aerodynamics , narrowband , acoustics , quiet , noise (video) , aerospace engineering , microphone , lift (data mining) , aeroacoustics , angle of attack , computer science , marine engineering , engineering , loudspeaker , physics , electronic engineering , sound pressure , data mining , quantum mechanics , image (mathematics) , artificial intelligence
International audienceIn this work, various microphone phased array data processing techniques are applied to two existing datasets from aeroacoustic wind tunnel tests. The first of these is from a large closed-wall facility, DLR's Kryo-Kanal Köln (DNW-KKK), and is a measurement of the high-lift noise of a semispan model. The second is from a small-scale open-jet facility, the NASA Langley Quiet Flow Facility (QFF), and is a measurement of a clean airfoil self-noise. The data had been made publicly available in 2015, and were analyzed by several research groups using multiple analysis techniques. This procedure allows the assessment of the variability of individual methods across various organizational implementations, as well as the variability of results produced by different array analysis methods. This paper summarizes the results presented at panel sessions held at AIAA conferences in 2015 and 2016. Results show that with appropriate handling of background noise, all advanced methods can identify dominant acoustic sources for a broad range of frequencies. Lower-level sources may be masked or underpredicted. Integrated levels are more robust and in closer agreement between methods than narrowband maps for individual frequencies. Overall there is no obvious best method, though multiple methods may be used to bound expected behavior. i Research Engineer, Aeroacoustics Branch, Senior Member AIAA, christopher.j.bahr@nasa.gov ii Research Engineer, Adv. Measurements and Data Systems Branch, Associate Fellow AIAA, william.m.humphreys@nasa.go

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom