A Comparison of Thruster Implementation Strategies for a Deep Space Nanosatellite

Attitude control for very small spacecraft, commonly referred to as nanosatellites or CubeSats, has traditionally been carried out using reaction wheels and magnetic torquers as the primary actuators. However, as these spacecraft begin to be considered for a broader range of scientic applications, including some beyond low Earth orbit, it has become necessary to also consider thruster systems for actuation. In recent years a number of thruster designs that conform to the mass, volume, and power constraints of nanosatellites have become commercially available, including cold gas systems, pulsed plasma thrusters (PPTs), and micro-electrospray propulsion (MEP) systems. The challenge now facing the nanosatellite community is to determine which thruster solutions are appropriate for a particular application, and what the best method of control might be. This paper will compare the implementation of a cold gas system to that of an MEP system for an upcoming nanosatellite mission using a previously reported saturation-restricted control law. Results are presented for this controller both with and without a fuel-optimal thruster allocation scheme, and a new approach to fuel optimization that considers the amount of fuel consumed by each individual thruster is introduced.