Mission and System Advantages of Iodine Hall Thrusters
Author(s) -
John Dankanich,
James Szabo,
Bruce Pote,
Steven R. Oleson,
Hani Kamhawi
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
49th aiaa/asme/sae/asee joint propulsion conference
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.2514/6.2014-3905
Subject(s) - propellant , propulsion , xenon , aerospace engineering , iodine , spacecraft , ion thruster , electrically powered spacecraft propulsion , environmental science , volume (thermodynamics) , astrobiology , range (aeronautics) , materials science , physics , engineering , atomic physics , thermodynamics , metallurgy
The exploration of alternative propellants for Hall thrusters continues to be of interest to the community. Investments have been made and continue for the maturation of iodine based Hall thrusters. Iodine testing has shown comparable performance to xenon. However, iodine has a higher storage density and resulting higher V capability for volume constrained systems. Iodine's vapor pressure is low enough to permit low-pressure storage, but high enough to minimize potential adverse spacecraft-thruster interactions. The low vapor pressure also means that iodine does not condense inside the thruster at ordinary operating temperatures. Iodine is safe, it stores at sub-atmospheric pressure, and can be stored unregulated for years on end; whether on the ground or on orbit. Iodine fills a niche for both low power ( 10kW) electric propulsion regimes. A range of missions have been evaluated for direct comparison of Iodine and Xenon options. The results show advantages of iodine Hall systems for both small and microsatellite application and for very large exploration class missions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom