Federalism without Federal Values? Austrian Citizens’ Attitudes towards Federalism and their Effects on Political Culture
Author(s) -
Peter Bußjäger
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
federal governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1923-6158
DOI - 10.24908/fg.v9i1.4407
Subject(s) - federalism , federalist , politics , political science , fiscal federalism , dual federalism , unitary state , law , new federalism , law and economics , public administration , sociology , decentralization
In his 2004 paper “Austria a federation without federalism?” the Canadian researcher Jan Erk stated that “the Austrian federation seems to work more as a unitary system because all political issues are set in a pan-Austrian frame of reference. This is because the federation lacks territorially based societal heterogeneity to sustain a principled commitment to federalism. Societal homogeneity induces a centralist political outlook at all levels of government which undermines the notion of self-rule in constituent units essential for federalism. (…) [T]he empirical evidence strongly suggests that the Austrian federation's centralist disposition stems from its social structure, not its formal constitution.” (Erk 2004: 20) Jan Erk does not stand alone with this estimation; not even in Austria. In the context of the discussion about the reform of Austrian federalism, Ewald Wiederin , an Austrian scholar and expert on federalism, characterized Austrian citizens’ attitudes towards federalism as follows: “Foderalist ist man nicht in der Sache, sondern fur das Gemut.” (“One is not a federalist when it comes to factual issues but for the mind.”) (Wiederin 2004: 58). This statement implies that federalism is deeply rooted in Austrian citizens’ minds and that they value the existence of the nine Lander. Yet, they are not in favor of lively federalism which results in different laws and different standards throughout the country. According to Wiederin Austrians prefer a unitary federation without federal competition among the Lander. Finally, Peter Busjager remarks that Austrian federalism is a problem of mentality (Busjager 2002: 149). According to Busjager citizens approve of unitary living conditions in the whole country while at the same time being in support of the notion that important matters of legislation remain within the autonomous sphere of competencies of the Lander. Presently this paradox seems to shape Austrian federalism. But is it really true? Is there any empirical evidence that substantiates this thesis?
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom