Improving the use of evidence in health impact assessment
Author(s) -
Jennifer S. Mindell,
Jane Biddulph,
Lorraine C. Taylor,
Karen Lock,
Annette Boaz,
Michael Joffe,
Sarah Curtis
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
bulletin of the world health organization
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.459
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1564-0604
pISSN - 0042-9686
DOI - 10.2471/blt.09.068510
Subject(s) - rigour , clarity , terminology , usability , public health , systematic review , evidence based practice , peer review , qualitative research , medical education , medicine , public relations , evidence based medicine , medline , computer science , political science , nursing , alternative medicine , sociology , geometry , mathematics , philosophy , pathology , law , social science , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , human–computer interaction
Health impact assessment (HIA) has been proposed as one mechanism that can inform decision-making by public policy-makers. However, HIA methodology has been criticized for a lack of rigour in its use of evidence. The aim of this work was to formulate, develop and test a practical guide to reviewing publicly available evidence for use in HIA. The term evidence includes all scientific assessments, whether research studies in peer-reviewed journals or previous HIAs.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom