English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background: During the past decade a debate has arisen on the possible utility of genomic science for public health\udpurposes. Within this context, a survey is being conducted to assess attitudes of European public health (PH) professionals\udbelonging to European Public Health Association (EUPHA) network regarding their role in the implementation of public\udhealth genomics (PHG), and their knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services.\udMethods: A pilot on-line survey was conducted on professionals from Sapienza University of Rome and the Vrije\udUniversity of Amsterdam. The survey tool is composed of 5 sections: Personal details, Professional activity, Knowledge\udon genetic testing and delivery of genetic services, Attitudes on genetic testing and delivery of genetic services,\udAttitudes on the role of PH professionals in PHG.\udResults: 34 people responded to the questionnaire, mostly medical doctors (61.8%). No respondents correctly identified all\udevidence-based applications of genetic testing. More than one third of respondents agreed that it would be more important\udto invest resources in the social and environmental causes of ill health than in genetic testing. Nearly 70% thought that PHG\udneeds to be grounded on evidence of effectiveness, a lower rate agreed ii should be grounded on cost-effectiveness. The\udrate of agreement with the proposed roles of PH professionals in PHG was very high.\udConclusion: This pilot study showed a positive attitude but the need to improve knowledge of PH professionals on\udPHG. It provided useful input for the implementation of the survey to all members of the EUPHA networ

European survey on knowledge and attitudes of public health professionals on public health genomics: Pilot Study