MUHAMMADIYAH: CONTESTING IDEOLOGIES BETWEEN PROGRESSIVE ISLAM AND TRADITIONAL
Author(s) -
Mursalim Munir,
Usman Jafar,
Barsihannor Barsihannor
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jicsa (journal of islamic civilization in southeast asia)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2549-7995
pISSN - 2302-1799
DOI - 10.24252/jicsa.v9i2.18653
Subject(s) - islam , ideology , sociology , context (archaeology) , epistemology , hegemony , dimension (graph theory) , social science , political science , law , politics , history , philosophy , theology , mathematics , archaeology , pure mathematics
The research focuses on examining the dynamics of variants of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, especially progressive Islamic thought and conservative Islam. The main objective of this research is to identify how the contestation model of the two variants strengthens its hegemony. To achieve this goal, library research was carried out using qualitative-descriptive-analytical methods and utilizing two approaches, namely historical perspectives and sociological knowledge. Based on the available literature, it is found that two tendencies of thought in Muhammadiyah, namely Progressive Islamic thought and Conservative Islam, contradict each other in areas which in the context of Muhammadiyah are closely related to the ideological dimension, namely the methodology of thought and thought construction. Contestation in this aspect has implications for the emergence of a more practical contestation, namely the efforts to market their ideas and beliefs through organizational structural and cultural channels outside the organizational authority.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom