z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An Approach to the Classification of Apparent Asphyxial Infant Deaths
Author(s) -
Evan W. Matshes,
Emma O. Lew
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
academic forensic pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.256
H-Index - 11
ISSN - 1925-3621
DOI - 10.23907/2017.021
Subject(s) - sudden infant death syndrome , medicine , forensic pathology , infant mortality , autopsy , medical emergency , asphyxia , cause of death , pediatrics , disease , intensive care medicine , pathology , environmental health , population
Recent evidence indicates that with thorough, high quality death investigations and autopsies, forensic pathologists have recognized that many unexpected infant deaths are, in fact, asphyxial in nature. With this recognition has come a commensurate decrease in, and in some cases, abolition of, the label “sudden infant death syndrome” (SIDS). Current controversies often pertain to how and why some infant deaths are determined to be asphyxial in nature and whether or not apparent asphyxial circumstances are risk factors for SIDS, or rather, harbingers of asphyxial deaths. In an effort to sidestep these controversies, some forensic pathologists elected to instead use the noncommittal label “sudden unexpected infant death” (SUID), leading to the unfortunate consequence of SUID – like SIDS – gaining notoriety as an actual disease that could be diagnosed, studied, and ultimately cured. Although it is not possible to provide death certification guidance for every conceivable type of unexpected infant death, we recognize and propose a simple classification system for overarching themes that cover the vast majority of cases where infants die suddenly and unexpectedly.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom