Ethics, Nanotechnology and Elite Sport - The Need For A Precautionary Approach

Elite sport is a competitive industry, with athletes continuously striving for innovative ways to gain advantages over their competitors. The increasing impact of sport sciences over recent decades has contributed much to this ethos, and has recently been witnessed in the application of sports engineering, working to integrate new technologies in order to enhance levels of athletic performance and also athlete safety. The application of nanotechnology offers a sport engineer the potential to improve equipment used both in and out of competition. Nevertheless, despite its emerging integration into sports sciences, limited attention has been paid to the ethical impacts this technology may have on elite sport. To address this problem, an eclectic normative approach is pursued, allowing for the range of nanotechnological application to elite sport to be considered, in order to generate critical ethical evaluations in relation to its current and potential use within elite sport. The issues were framed variously through consequentialist and deontological analysis. Three nanotechnological case studies are presented, highlighting potential benefits and disbenefits that nanotechnology may present, and to additionally determine whether, and if so, what, deontologically framed regulatory action were required to govern its use within elite sport. The first case study considered nanotechnology's application to the sport of road cycling; the second considered nanotechnology's application to performance analysis; and the third considered nanotechnology's application to horse race betting. The analysis of the case studies revealed that nanotechnology presents a number of benefits for elite sport, such as improved levels of performance and enhanced safety; but also disbenefits, such as those relating to fairness and corruption. Despite this, it is argued that, at present, nanotechnology does not pose a significant risk to the integrity of sport. But in order to reduce any future risk, the disbenefits should be addressed. A case is consequently argued for the application of a weak version of the Precautionary Principle applied through an original ethical analytical tool, in order to govern the initial integration phase of nanotechnology. The work concludes by outlining more specific regulatory actions that could be taken in order to inform the development of a 'nano' specific regulatory framework, in order to govern nanotechnology's continued long term safe and ethical use within elite sport.