Payment for environmental services
Author(s) -
Birte Snilsveit
Publication year - 2019
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.23846/b/sr/201906
Subject(s) - fragility , socioeconomic status , quarter (canadian coin) , german , christian ministry , distress , payment , business , economic growth , development economics , demographic economics , political science , economics , geography , psychology , demography , sociology , finance , population , chemistry , archaeology , law , psychotherapist
The review identified a range of PES programme design criteria. Two stand out: PES programmes need to carefully target participants corresponding to the social or economic programme objectives; and there is a need to invest in the development of strong local governance structures for the programmes. Payment for environmental services (PES) programmes provide economic or in-kind incentives to encourage landowners to adopt behaviours that are thought to conserve or restore ecosystems services.1 PES programmes, initially a means of environmental conservation, have grown in popularity in the last two decades. More recently, they have been promoted as a climate change mitigation measure, and some programmes aim to improve socio-economic outcomes and alleviate poverty. Despite their increasing popularity, key policy questions around the effectiveness of PES on environmental and socio-economic outcomes remain unanswered.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom