United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities
Author(s) -
DC Spelic,
RV Kaczmarek,
Mike C. Hilohi,
S Belella
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
biomedical imaging and intervention journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1823-5530
DOI - 10.2349/biij.3.2.e35
Subject(s) - mammography , quality assurance , workload , medical physics , imaging phantom , digital mammography , medicine , image quality , audit , quality (philosophy) , radiological weapon , medical physicist , nuclear medicine , radiology , computer science , artificial intelligence , breast cancer , philosophy , external quality assessment , management , epistemology , pathology , cancer , economics , image (mathematics) , operating system
Purpose: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards for high-quality mammography, including standards for mammographic X-ray equipment, patient dose, clinical image quality, and related technical parameters. The MQSA also requires minimum qualifications for radiologic technologists, interpreting physicians and medical physicists, mandates acceptable practices for quality-control, quality-assurance, and requires processes to audit medical outcomes. This paper presents the findings of MQSA inspections of facilities, which characterize significant factors affecting mammography quality in the United States. Materials and Methods: Trained inspectors collected data regarding X-ray technical factors, made exposure measurements for the determination of mean glandular dose (MGD), evaluated image quality, and inspected the quality of the film-processing environment. The average annual facility and total U.S. screening exam workloads were computed using workload data reported by facilities. Results: Mammography facilities have made technical improvements as evidenced by a narrower distribution of doses, higher phantom-film background optical densities associated with higher phantom image-quality scores, and better film processing. It is estimated that approximately 36 million screening mammography exams were conducted in 2006, a rate that is almost triple the exam volume estimated for 1997. Digital mammography (DM) is now in use at approximately 14% (1,191 of 8,834) of MQSA-certified mammography facilities. The results indicate that DM can offer lower dose to the patient while providing comparable or better image quality.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom