Continuing Educational Inertia?
Author(s) -
Kyle R. Peters
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical diabetes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.931
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1945-4953
pISSN - 0891-8929
DOI - 10.2337/diaclin.32.3.97
Subject(s) - medicine , misinformation , inertia , health care , formulary , nursing , medical education , physics , classical mechanics , political science , law , economics , economic growth
According to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2010 data, 52.5% of patients with diabetes obtained an A1C < 7%.1 Less than 7% is not the goal for all patients, but it is for the majority; therefore, numerous patients are not achieving goals.One proposed reason health care providers (HCPs) struggle to get patients to goal is clinical inertia. Clinical inertia is defined as recognition of the problem, but failure to act.2 Clinical inertia leads to delivery of suboptimal care and is complicated by many factors, including access to care, insurance formularies, and patient adherence.What if there is another reason that is never discussed? I believe another reason patients are not reaching their goals is something I am calling “educational inertia.” I define educational inertia as learning information in an attempt to improve clinical skills from data that are clinically inaccurate or outdated. This misinformation is then applied to patient care, resulting in poor outcomes. Every effort is needed to stop educational inertia and thus to arm HCPs with the current knowledge and skills essential to get patients to goal in a challenging health care environment.I identified educational inertia while attending two diabetes association annual meetings in …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom