Speaking to Patients About Diabetes Risk: Is Terminology Important?
Author(s) -
Valentina Tarasova,
Jaime Alexander Caballero,
Paul Turner,
Silvio E. Inzucchi
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical diabetes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.931
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1945-4953
pISSN - 0891-8929
DOI - 10.2337/diaclin.32.2.90
Subject(s) - prediabetes , medicine , impaired fasting glucose , impaired glucose tolerance , diabetes mellitus , type 2 diabetes , terminology , gerontology , endocrinology , linguistics , philosophy
I t is estimated that 79 million people in the United States (35% of adults ≥ 20 years of age and 50% of adults ≥ 65 years of age) have mild degrees of hyperglycemia and are thereby at risk for developing type 2 diabetes.1 Scientific jargon such as “impaired glucose tolerance” (IGT), “impaired fasting glucose” (IFG), and “elevated A1C” may be too technical or cumbersome to use with most patients. Accordingly, preferred terminologies such as “prediabetes” and “at high risk for diabetes” have entered the clinical lexicon and are felt to be simple enough to be understood by the average patient and also sufficiently motivating to encourage lifestyle change to prevent further deterioration to type 2 diabetes.However, there is debate in the literature regarding which term is most suitable to describe this stage in the development of diabetes. In 2009, the International Expert Committee criticized the term “prediabetes” because it suggests unequivocal progression to diabetes—not an inevitable occurrence2—and advocated for use of the “high risk” terminology instead. The American Diabetes Association, however, has continued to use “prediabetes,” considering it an appropriate description of this at-risk category.3 Other groups, including the World Health Organization and the International Diabetes Federation, have been using different terms for increased diabetes risk, such as “intermediate hyperglycemia,” as well as the more technical IGT and IFG.4,5 However, those descriptors are not routinely used by practitioners in the United States. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists preferred “prediabetes” in its 2011 guidelines.6Prediabetes is usually an asymptomatic state. However, it has been associated with certain morbidities, including early stages of neuropathy and macrovascular disease.7 For health care providers (HCPs), recognition of this stage is essential because it provides opportunities for patient education about the importance of initiating …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom