Accuracy of 1-Hour Plasma Glucose During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: A Meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Vasudha Ahuja,
Pasi Aronen,
Thyparambil Aravindakshan Pramodkumar,
Helen C. Looker,
Angela Chetrit,
Aini Bloigu,
Auni Juutilainen,
Cristina Bianchi,
Lucia La Sala,
Ranjit Mohan Anjana,
Rajendra Pradeepa,
Ulagamathesan Venkatesan,
Sarvanan Jebarani,
Viswanathan Baskar,
Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino,
Patrick Timpel,
Ralph A. DeFronzo,
Antonio Ceriello,
Stefano Del Prato,
Muhammad AbdulGhani,
Sirkka KeinänenKiukaanniemi,
Rachel Dankner,
Peter H. Bennett,
William C. Knowler,
Peter E. H. Schwarz,
Giorgio Sesti,
Rie Oka,
Viswanathan Mohan,
Leif Groop,
Jaakko Tuomilehto,
Samuli Ripatti,
Michael Bergman
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
diabetes care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.636
H-Index - 363
eISSN - 1935-5548
pISSN - 0149-5992
DOI - 10.2337/dc20-1688
Subject(s) - medicine , diabetes mellitus , type 2 diabetes , confidence interval , cutoff , gastroenterology , glucose tolerance test , plasma glucose , endocrinology , gold standard (test) , meta analysis , area under the curve , receiver operating characteristic , predictive value of tests , insulin resistance , quantum mechanics , physics
OBJECTIVE One-hour plasma glucose (1-h PG) during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is an accurate predictor of type 2 diabetes. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the optimum cutoff of 1-h PG for detection of type 2 diabetes using 2-h PG as the gold standard. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We included 15 studies with 35,551 participants from multiple ethnic groups (53.8% Caucasian) and 2,705 newly detected cases of diabetes based on 2-h PG during OGTT. We excluded cases identified only by elevated fasting plasma glucose and/or HbA1c. We determined the optimal 1-h PG threshold and its accuracy at this cutoff for detection of diabetes (2-h PG ≥11.1 mmol/L) using a mixed linear effects regression model with different weights to sensitivity/specificity (2/3, 1/2, and 1/3). RESULTS Three cutoffs of 1-h PG, at 10.6 mmol/L, 11.6 mmol/L, and 12.5 mmol/L, had sensitivities of 0.95, 0.92, and 0.87 and specificities of 0.86, 0.91, and 0.94 at weights 2/3, 1/2, and 1/3, respectively. The cutoff of 11.6 mmol/L (95% CI 10.6, 12.6) had a sensitivity of 0.92 (0.87, 0.95), specificity of 0.91 (0.88, 0.93), area under the curve 0.939 (95% confidence region for sensitivity at a given specificity: 0.904, 0.946), and a positive predictive value of 45%. CONCLUSIONS The 1-h PG of ≥11.6 mmol/L during OGTT has a good sensitivity and specificity for detecting type 2 diabetes. Prescreening with a diabetes-specific risk calculator to identify high-risk individuals is suggested to decrease the proportion of false-positive cases. Studies including other ethnic groups and assessing complication risk are warranted.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom