z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Impact of the Diabetes Canada Guideline Dissemination Strategy on the Prescription of Vascular Protective Medications: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2010–2015
Author(s) -
Alanna Rigobon,
Sumeet Kalia,
Jennica Nichols,
Babak Aliarzadeh,
Michelle Greiver,
Rahim Moineddin,
Frank Sullivan,
Catherine Yu
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
diabetes care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.636
H-Index - 363
eISSN - 1935-5548
pISSN - 0149-5992
DOI - 10.2337/dc18-0935
Subject(s) - medicine , diabetes mellitus , guideline , medical prescription , retrospective cohort study , cohort , cohort study , family medicine , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , pharmacology , endocrinology , pathology
OBJECTIVE The 2013 Diabetes Canada guidelines launched targeted dissemination tools and a simple assessment for vascular protection. We aimed to 1) examine changes associated with the launch of the 2013 guidelines and additional dissemination efforts in the rates of vascular protective medications prescribed in primary care for older patients with diabetes and 2) examine differences in the rates of prescriptions of vascular protective medications by patient and provider characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The study population included patients (≥40 years of age) from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) with type 2 diabetes and at least one clinic visit from April 2010 to December 2015. An interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the proportion of eligible patients prescribed a statin, ACE inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), or antiplatelet prescription in each quarter. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions were the reference control. RESULTS A dynamic cohort was used where participants were enrolled each quarter using a prespecified set of conditions (range 25,985–70,693 per quarter). There were no significant changes in statin (P = 0.43), ACEI/ARB (P = 0.42), antiplatelet (P = 0.39), or PPI (P = 0.16) prescriptions at baseline (guideline intervention). After guideline publication, there was a significant change in slope for statin (−0.52% per quarter, SE 0.15, P < 0.05), ACEI/ARB (−0.38% per quarter, SE 0.13, P < 0.05), and reference PPI (−0.18% per quarter, SE 0.05, P < 0.05) prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS There was a decrease in prescribing trends over time that was not specific to vascular protective medications. More effective knowledge translation strategies are needed to improve vascular protection in diabetes in order for patients to receive the most effective interventions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom