Metabolic Contrasts Between Youth and Adults With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Recently Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: II. Observations Using the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
Author(s) -
David A. Ehrmann,
Karla A. Temple,
Abby Rue,
Elena Barengolts,
Babak Mokhlesi,
Eve Van Cauter,
Susan Sam,
M. Annette Miller,
Steven E. Kahn,
Karen M. Atkinson,
Jerry P. Palmer,
Kristina M. Utzschneider,
Tsige Gebremedhin,
Abigail KernanSchloss,
Alexandra Kozedub,
Brenda K. Montgomery,
Emily J. Morse,
Kieren J. Mather,
Tammy Garrett,
Tamara S. Han,
Amale Lteif,
Aniket Patel,
Robin Chisholm,
Karen Moore,
Vivian Pirics,
Linda Pratt,
Kristen J. Nadeau,
Susan Gross,
Philip Zeitler,
Jayne Williams,
Melanie CreeGreen,
Yesenia GarciaReyes,
Krista Vissat,
Silva Arslanian,
Kathleen Brown,
Nancy Guerra,
Kristin E. Porter,
Sonia Caprio,
Mary Savoye,
Bridget Pierpont,
Thomas A. Buchanan,
Anny H. Xiang,
Enrique Trigo,
Elizabeth Beale,
Fadi N. Hendee,
Namir Katkhouda,
Krishan Nayak,
Mayra P. Martinez,
Cortney Montgomery,
Xinhui Wang,
Sharon L. Edelstein,
John M. Lachin,
Ashley N. Hogan,
Santica M. Marcovina,
Jessica Harting,
John J. Albers,
Dave Hill,
Peter J. Savage,
Ellen W. Leschek
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
diabetes care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.636
H-Index - 363
eISSN - 1935-5548
pISSN - 0149-5992
DOI - 10.2337/dc18-0243
Subject(s) - medicine , impaired glucose tolerance , diabetes mellitus , glucose tolerance test , type 2 diabetes , endocrinology , test (biology) , carbohydrate metabolism , insulin resistance , paleontology , biology
OBJECTIVE To compare oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose, C-peptide, and insulin responses and insulin sensitivity in youth and adults with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 66 youth (80.3% with IGT) and 355 adults (70.7% with IGT) underwent a 3-h OGTT to assess 1) insulin sensitivity (1/fasting insulin), 2) C-peptide index (CPI) and insulinogenic index (IGI) over the first 30 min, and 3) glucose, C-peptide, and insulin incremental areas above fasting over the 3-h post-ingestion (incremental glucose [G-iAUC], incremental C-peptide [CP-iAUC], and incremental insulin area under the curve [I-iAUC] responses, respectively). RESULTS Fasting, 2-h glucose, and G-iAUC were similar in both age-groups, but youth had ∼50% lower 1/fasting insulin (P < 0.001), 75% higher CPI (mean [95% CI] 0.703 [0.226, 2.183] vs. 0.401 [0.136, 1.183] nmol/mmol; P < 0.001), and more than twofold higher IGI (257.3 [54.5, 1,215.8] vs. 114.8 [28.0, 470.8] pmol/mmol; P < 0.001). Two-hour C-peptide and insulin concentrations, CP-iAUC, and I-iAUC were all higher in youth (all P < 0.001). C-peptide and insulin responses remained significantly greater in youth after adjustment for insulin sensitivity. Within each age-group, individuals with type 2 diabetes versus IGT had significantly lower CPI and IGI with no difference in insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS The balance between insulin sensitivity and β-cell responses differs between youth and adults with IGT or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Despite similar postload glucose levels, youth demonstrate greater C-peptide and insulin responses that exceed what is needed to compensate for their lower insulin sensitivity. Longitudinal studies are required to determine whether this feature contributes to a more rapid decline in β-cell function in youth with dysglycemia.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom