English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We read with interest the article by Bress et al. (1) reporting on the effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure treatment according to baseline prediabetes status in a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). The authors concluded that the beneficial effects of intensive blood pressure treatment were similar among patients with prediabetes and patients with normoglycemia. We have participated in the SPRINT Data Analysis Challenge (2), and we also analyzed the effects of glycemia status in this population. Whereas we agree with the conclusions presented by the authors, we believe it is also important to assess the effect …

diabetes care

Comment on Bress et al. Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Treatment According to Baseline Prediabetes Status: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1401–1408