z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Response to Comment on Lázaro-Martínez et al. Antibiotics Versus Conservative Surgery for Treating Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Randomized Comparative Trial. Diabetes Care 2014;37:789–795
Author(s) -
José Luís LázaroMartínez,
Javier AragónSánchez,
Esther GarcíaMorales
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
diabetes care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.636
H-Index - 363
eISSN - 1935-5548
pISSN - 0149-5992
DOI - 10.2337/dc14-0114
Subject(s) - medicine , osteomyelitis , antibiotics , diabetic foot , diabetes mellitus , surgery , bone biopsy , osteitis , bone infection , histopathology , biopsy , pathology , endocrinology , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
We appreciate very much the comments on our article (1) from Landman et al. (2). It could be extracted that every patient in whom osteomyelitis is suspected should undergo a bone biopsy, but this is not based on evidence. Based on this thought, the current tendency of treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis exclusively with antibiotics could not be supported. Most studies in which the patients were treated with antibiotics did not have microbiologic and/or histopathologic confirmation of bone infection. The only modern series confirming osteomyelitis by histopathology and microbiology are probably surgical. We could conclude that most patients in whom antibiotics were successful did not in fact have osteomyelitis. …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom