English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We read with great interest the article by Tran et al. (1), in which the authors compared the discriminative power of prognostic models for early prediction of women at risk for the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The research group found 5.9% prevalence of GDM by American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria. The selective screening of women for GDM using the ADA model with a risk threshold of 3% gave 93% sensitivity for identification of women with GDM, with a 27% reduction in the number of oral glucose tolerance tests required.If we simplify the results, it means missing 4 out of 59 cases of GDM in …

diabetes care

Comment on: Tran et al. Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Vietnam: Clinical Impact of Currently Recommended Diagnostic Criteria. Diabetes Care 2013;36:618–624