Comment on: Margolis et al. Lack of Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer and the Prevention of Amputation: A Cohort Study. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1961–1966
Author(s) -
S. Sherlock
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
diabetes care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.636
H-Index - 363
eISSN - 1935-5548
pISSN - 0149-5992
DOI - 10.2337/dc13-0607
Subject(s) - medicine , amputation , diabetic foot , propensity score matching , diabetes mellitus , hyperbaric oxygen , affect (linguistics) , preference , foot (prosody) , matching (statistics) , hyperbaric oxygenation , intensive care medicine , physical therapy , surgery , pathology , linguistics , philosophy , microeconomics , economics , endocrinology
I read with interest and some disbelief the article by Margolis et al. (1), who conclude that “the usefulness of [hyperbaric oxygen (HBO)] in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers needs to be reevaluated.” Statistical manipulation cannot change the big problem with the study design. Propensity score matching is a technique to be used in situations with substantial overlap between treatment and control groups to account for observed covariates. Factors that affect assignment to treatment but that cannot be observed (e.g., financial gain, clinician preference, lack of vascular surgical input, etc.) cannot be accounted for. It has been argued that this technique may increase hidden …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom