z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Measuring Abdominal Obesity: Effects of Height on Distribution of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Risk Using Waist Circumference and Waist-to-Height Ratio
Author(s) -
Harald J. Schneider,
Jens Klotsche,
Sigmund Silber,
Günter K. Stalla,
HansUlrich Wïttchen
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
diabetes care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.636
H-Index - 363
eISSN - 1935-5548
pISSN - 0149-5992
DOI - 10.2337/dc10-1794
Subject(s) - waist , medicine , waist to height ratio , abdominal obesity , circumference , cutoff , metabolic syndrome , obesity , diabetes mellitus , cardiology , endocrinology , mathematics , geometry , physics , quantum mechanics
Accumulating evidence suggests that measures of abdominal obesity outperform BMI in predicting diabetes and cardiovascular risk (1–3). However, it is debated which measure of obesity should be used. Currently, waist circumference (WC) is most commonly used and codefines the metabolic syndrome (4).Unlike waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), WC does not take differences in height into account. We hypothesized that short subjects with a WC at a specified cutoff-point will have more abdominal fat and associated cardiovascular risk factors than tall subjects with a WC at the same cutoff-point and that this will not be the case if WHtR is used instead of WC. To test this hypothesis, we compared the distribution of cardiovascular risk factors according to height above and below commonly used cutoffs of WC and WHtR in a cross-sectional study.We studied 6,971 subjects (mean age 57.6 ± …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom