z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion
Author(s) -
Lucia Cevidanes,
Tiziano Baccetti,
Lorenzo Franchi,
James A. McNamara,
Hugo De Clerck
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the angle orthodontist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1945-7103
pISSN - 0003-3219
DOI - 10.2319/111709-651.1
Subject(s) - medicine , sagittal plane , orthodontics , dentistry , significant difference , cephalometry , anatomy
To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the active treatment effects for maxillary advancement induced by bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) and the active treatment effects for face mask in association with rapid maxillary expansion (RME/FM).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom