z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Trust and Professional Skepticism in the Relationship between Auditors and Clients: Overcoming the Dichotomy Myth
Author(s) -
Ewald Aschauer,
Matthias Fink,
Andrea Moro,
Katharina van Bakel-Auer,
Bent WarmingRasmussen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
behavioral research in accounting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.311
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1558-8009
pISSN - 1050-4753
DOI - 10.2308/bria-51654
Subject(s) - skepticism , audit , interpersonal communication , psychology , accounting , identification (biology) , perception , social psychology , business , public relations , epistemology , political science , philosophy , botany , neuroscience , biology
This study empirically investigates the relationship between auditors' identification-based trust in client firms' managers (CEOs/CFOs) and their perceptions of auditors' professional skepticism. We employ a multimethod approach broken down into two studies. First, in Study 1, we approached auditors and clients using narrative interviews in order to identify the working definitions of interpersonal trust and professional skepticism and also to develop an empirical and testable hypothesis against the backdrop of the current literature. Second, in Study 2, an ordinary least squares regression based on data collected from 233 real auditor-client dyads in Germany reveals that auditors' identification-based trust is positively associated with their clients' perception of the auditors' professional skepticism. The identified coexistence of trust and professional skepticism in auditor-client dyads implies that regulatory measures that impede the evolution of trust between auditors and their clients wil...

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom