z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Some Notes on the Constituent Structure of Noun Phrases
Author(s) -
Emmon Bach
Publication year - 1963
Publication title -
american speech
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.321
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1527-2133
pISSN - 0003-1283
DOI - 10.2307/453229
Subject(s) - linguistics , noun phrase , noun , nominalization , history , philosophy
Robert B. Lees's article on "The Constituent Structure of Noun Phrases"' invites a number of comments. Since the definite article is introduced as dependent on a (subsequently deletable) relative clause symbol, "CN" (p. 164, rules iv and ix), there will be kernel sentences enumerated by Lees's grammar which are not sentences of English, for instance, "The C, man is on the C, corner" (and nonkernel, derived sentences such as "The man is on the comrner"). This result follows from the definition of a kernel sentence as one which has undergone only obligatory transformations and from the fact that the deletion of "CN" is optional. The rule must be optional, of course, if we are to have derivable sentences with relative clauses, attributive adjectives, and so on. Or, if the rule is obligatory and follows the development of the clause symbols by generalized (i.e., two-sentence) transformations, then there must be an ad hoc specification that the result of substituting a second source sentence (with a relative pronoun formant) for the clause symbols "Cp" or "Cm" (which develop from "CN" in the constituent structure rules) is no longer a "CN." Alternatively, the generalized transformations which perform the substitution might be obligatory rules, but then all sorts of complex sentences would be

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom