z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
REPRESENTATIONALISM AND SENSORY MODALITIES: AN ARGUMENT FOR INTERMODAL REPRESENTATIONALISM
Author(s) -
David Bourget
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american philosophical quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.49
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 2152-1123
pISSN - 0003-0481
DOI - 10.2307/44982142
Subject(s) - direct and indirect realism , argument (complex analysis) , modalities , representation (politics) , epistemology , stimulus modality , modality (human–computer interaction) , psychology , contrast (vision) , philosophy , cognitive psychology , cognitive science , perception , aesthetics , sociology , computer science , chemistry , political science , human–computer interaction , artificial intelligence , social science , biochemistry , politics , law
Intermodal representationalists hold that the phenomenal characters of experiences are fully determined by their contents. In contrast, intramodal representationalists hold that the phenomenal characters of experiences are determined by their contents together with their intentional modes or manners of representation, which are nonrepresentational features corresponding roughly to the sensory modalities. This paper discusses a kind of experience that provides evidence for an intermodal representationalist view: intermodal experiences, experiences that unify experiences in different modalities. I argue that such experiences are much easier to explain on the intermodal view.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom