A comment on glenn Firebaugh’s “population density and fertility”
Author(s) -
Eric Jensen
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
demography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.099
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1533-7790
pISSN - 0070-3370
DOI - 10.2307/2061622
Subject(s) - counterintuitive , fertility , judgement , population , demography , econometrics , yield (engineering) , statistics , statistical hypothesis testing , economics , mathematics , sociology , law , political science , philosophy , materials science , epistemology , metallurgy
Conclusion Firebaugh has attempted to test an interesting, if counterintuitive, theory. I have argued that his empirical model is incompletely specified, and that one should reserve judgement on his hypothesis until a better means of testing it can be developed. In particular, the use of ratio variables and pooled data create substantial statistical problems.f The simultaneous responses of the CBR and village population size to outside-of-model variation yield an inflated estimate of the effect of population density on fertility.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom